Analysis of combinatorial CRISPR screens with the Orthrus scoring pipeline

Chad L. Myers, Henry N. Ward, Michael Aregger, Thomas Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, Maximilian Billmann, Toshiro K. Ohsumi, Kevin R. Brown, Benjamin J. Blencowe, Jason Moffat

Published: 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00596-0

Combinatorial CRISPR screens

Orthrus scoring pipeline

Multiplexed screening

gRNA expression

Screen quality assessment

AI 解读

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Tutorial on how to set up input files to run the Orthrus scoring pipeline

Efficient and safe single-cell cloning of human pluripotent stem cells using the CEPT cocktail

Profiling native pulmonary basement membrane stiffness using atomic force microscopy

Genetic circuit design automation with Cello 2.0

Synthesis of siRNA nanoparticles to silence plaque-destabilizing gene in atherosclerotic lesional macrophages

Scalable dual-omics profiling with single-nucleus chromatin accessibility and mRNA expression sequencing 2 (SNARE-seq2)

A practical guide to scanning light-field microscopy with digital adaptive optics

Effective high-throughput isolation of fully human antibodies targeting infectious pathogens

Improved sampling and DNA extraction procedures for microbiome analysis in food-processing environments

MOF-derived nanoporous carbons with diverse tunable nanoarchitectures

Tutorial: a statistical genetics guide to identifying HLA alleles driving complex disease

查看全部

Sections

Figures

References

Supplementary information

VanderSluis, B. et al. Integrating genetic and protein–protein interaction networks maps a functional wiring diagram of a cell. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 45, 170–179 (2018).
Costanzo, M. et al. A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function. Science 353, aaf1420–aaf1420 (2016).
Simpkins, S. W. et al. Predicting bioprocess targets of chemical compounds through integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006532–e1006532 (2018).
Piotrowski, J. S. et al. Functional annotation of chemical libraries across diverse biological processes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 982–993 (2017).
Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014).
Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M. & Lander, E. S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science 343, 80–84 (2014).
Hart, T. et al. High-resolution CRISPR screens reveal fitness genes and genotype-specific cancer liabilities. Cell 163, 1515–1526 (2015).
Ruiz, S. et al. A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies CDC25A as a determinant of sensitivity to ATR inhibitors. Mol. Cell 62, 307–313 (2016).
Wong, A. S. L. et al. Multiplexed barcoded CRISPR-Cas9 screening enabled by CombiGEM. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 2544–2549 (2016).
Tsherniak, A. et al. Defining a cancer dependency map. Cell 170, 564–576.e16 (2017).
Aregger, M. et al. Systematic mapping of genetic interactions for de novo fatty acid synthesis identifies C12orf49 as a regulator of lipid metabolism. Nat. Metab 2, 499–513 (2020).
Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, T. et al. Genetic interaction mapping and exon-resolution functional genomics with a hybrid Cas9–Cas12a platform. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 638–648 (2020).
Najm, F. J. et al. Orthologous CRISPR-Cas9 enzymes for combinatorial genetic screens. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 179–189 (2018).
Shen, J. P. et al. Combinatorial CRISPR-Cas9 screens for de novo mapping of genetic interactions. Nat. Methods 14, 573–576 (2017).
Han, K. et al. Synergistic drug combinations for cancer identified in a CRISPR screen for pairwise genetic interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 463–474 (2017).
Gier, R. A. et al. High-performance CRISPR-Cas12a genome editing for combinatorial genetic screening. Nat. Commun. 11, 3455 (2020).
Horlbeck, M. A. et al. Mapping the genetic landscape of human cells. Cell 174, 953–967.e22 (2018).
Dede, M., McLaughlin, M., Kim, E. & Hart, T. Multiplex enCas12a screens detect functional buffering among paralogs otherwise masked in monogenic Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol 21, 262 (2020).
Replogle, J. M. et al. Combinatorial single-cell CRISPR screens by direct guide RNA capture and targeted sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 954–961 (2020).
Ward., H. csbio/orthrus: Protocol Release (v0.4.3.3). Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4827171 (2021).
Zamanighomi, M. et al. GEMINI: a variational Bayesian approach to identify genetic interactions from combinatorial CRISPR screens. Genome Biol. 20, 137 (2019).
Aregger, M. et al. Application of CHyMErA Cas9-Cas12a combinatorial genome-editing platform for genetic interaction mapping and gene fragment deletion screening. Nat. Protoc. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00595-1 (2021).
Imkeller, K., Ambrosi, G., Boutros, M. & Huber, W. gscreend: modelling asymmetric count ratios in CRISPR screens to decrease experiment size and improve phenotype detection. Genome Biol 21, 53 (2020).
Hart, T., Brown, K. R., Sircoulomb, F., Rottapel, R. & Moffat, J. Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 733 (2014).
Boucher, B. & Jenna, S. Genetic interaction networks: better understand to better predict. Front. Genet. 4, 290 (2013).
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
Yang, Y. H. et al. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e15 (2002).

Analysis of combinatorial CRISPR screens with the Orthrus scoring pipeline

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

推荐阅读